Forum | Documentation | Website | Blog

Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
user avatar
Chuck Lever authored
I still see "RPC: Could not send backchannel reply error: -110"
quite often, along with slow-running tests. Debugging shows that the
backchannel is still stumbling when it has to queue a callback reply
on a busy transport.

Note that every one of these timeouts causes a connection loss by
virtue of the xprt_conditional_disconnect() call in that arm of
call_cb_transmit_status().

I found that setting to_maxval is necessary to get the RPC timeout
logic to behave whenever to_exponential is not set.

Fixes: 57331a59

 ("NFSv4.1: Use the nfs_client's rpc timeouts for backchannel")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
6ddc9dea
Forked from BeagleBoard.org / image-builder
Source project has a limited visibility.
Name Last commit Last update