Forum | Documentation | Website | Blog

Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 6ddc9dea authored by Chuck Lever's avatar Chuck Lever Committed by Trond Myklebust
Browse files

SUNRPC: Fix backchannel reply, again

I still see "RPC: Could not send backchannel reply error: -110"
quite often, along with slow-running tests. Debugging shows that the
backchannel is still stumbling when it has to queue a callback reply
on a busy transport.

Note that every one of these timeouts causes a connection loss by
virtue of the xprt_conditional_disconnect() call in that arm of
call_cb_transmit_status().

I found that setting to_maxval is necessary to get the RPC timeout
logic to behave whenever to_exponential is not set.

Fixes: 57331a59

 ("NFSv4.1: Use the nfs_client's rpc timeouts for backchannel")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
parent 6ba59ff4
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment